Atomicity & Countability in Linguistically-Informed Instruction
Atomicidad y contabilidad en la enseñanza lingüísticamente informada: adquisición de los tipos de nombres en inglés como L2 -- doi: https://doi.org/10.31810/rsel.53.2.3
Keywords:
Atomicidad; contabilidad; adquisición generativa de segundas lenguas; adquisición de segundas lenguas en contextos de instrucción; instrucción lingüísticamente informada; pedagogía lingüísticaAbstract
While the literature shows that there is strong support for the effects of explicit instruction on explicit language knowledge, there has been little research on the effects of different types of explicit instruction on language acquisition. This study attempts to bridge the gap between Instructed Second Language Acquisition and Generative Second Language Acquisition by creating an instructional context that employs Generative theories and findings in order to teach L2-English articles and noun types. The study investigates L1-Mandarin learners in three different instructional contexts (linguistically-informed instruction, traditional instruction, and no extra instruction) acquiring countable and uncountable nouns in an indefinite-singular article context in L2 English. As measured by an elicited-sentence imitation task and an acceptability judgment task at pre-test, immediate posttest, and three-week-delayed post-test, the results find that learners receiving explicit instruction on the semantic features needing to be reassembled make the greatest gains over the duration of the study. These findings suggest that if linguistically-informed instruction were implemented in a systematic way throughout an entire grammar course, it may lead to greater linguistic gains in a shorter amount of time.
Downloads
References
Akakura, M. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of explicit instruction on implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 9-37.
Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition, 97(1), 41-66. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027704001787?via%3Dihub
Bowles, M. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contibute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 247-271.
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2013). What research can tell us about teaching: The case of pronouns and clitics. In M. Whong, K.-H. Gil, & H. Marsden (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom (pp. 17-34). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bunting, J. D., Diniz, L., & Reppen, R. (2009). Grammar and beyond 4. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R. (1998). Yi-wang tang, yi-ge tang: classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 28(3), 385-412.
Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 509-542. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192
Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R. (2014). The syntactic structure of noun phrases. In C. T. J. Huang, Y. H. A. Li, & A. Simpson (Eds.), The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics (pp. 248-274). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cho, J. (2012). Remapping nominal features in the second language. (PhD Dissertation). University of Iowa,
Cho, J., & Slabakova, R. (2014). Interpreting definiteness in a second language without articles: The case of L2 Russian. Second Language Research, 30(2), 159-190.
Choi, S. H., & Ionin, T. (2017). Acquisition and processing of mass nouns in L2-English by L2 learners from generalized classifier langauges: Evidence for the role of atomicity. In M. LeMendola & J. Scott (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Boston University Conference on Langauge Development (BUCLD 2016) (Vol. 1, pp. 154-167). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
Choi, S. H., Ionin, T., & Zhu, Y. (2018). L1 Korean and L1 Mandarin L2 English learners’ acquisition of the count/mass distinction in English. Second Language Research, 34(2), 147-177.
Choi, S. H., Zhu, Y., & Ionin, T. (2019). Interpretation of count and mass NPs by L2 learners from generalized classifier L1s. In T. Ionin & M. Rispoli (Eds.), Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research: Selected Papers from the 7th Meeting of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (pp. 253-270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed CLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Ellis, R. (2005b). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second langauge: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141-172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096
Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philip, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3-25). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol, UK ; Buffalo [N.Y.]: Multilingual Matters.
Gillon, B. (1992). Towards a common semantics for english count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15(6), 597-639. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628112
Hua, D., & Lee, T. H.-t. (2005). Chinese ESL learners’ understanding of the English count-mass distinction. In L. Dekydtspotter, R. A. Sprouse, & A. Liljestrand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004) (pp. 138-149). Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Inagaki, S. (2013). Syntax-semantics mappings as a source of difficulty in Japanese speakers’ acquisition of the mass-count distinction in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(3), 464-477.
Lardiere, D. (2008). Feature-assembly in seond language acquisition. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 106-140). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lardiere, D. (2009a). Further thoughts on parameteres and features in second language acquisition: A reply to peer comments on Lardiere’s ‘Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition’ in SLR 25(2). Second Language Research, 25(3), 409-422.
Lardiere, D. (2009b). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173-227.
Loewen, S. (2015). Introduction to Instructed Second Langauge Acquisition (1 ed.). New York: Routledge.
Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of resaerch. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359-382.
Long, M. H. (2009). Language teaching. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 3-5). Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Lopez, E. (2017). Teaching the English article system: Definiteness and specificity in linguistically-informed instruction. Language Teaching Research, 23(2), 200-217.
Lopez, E., & Sabir, M. (2017). Article pedagogy: Encouraging links between linguistic theory and teaching practice. RELC Journal, 50(1), 188-201.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217730143
Marsden, H., & Slabakova, R. (2019). Grammatical meaning and the second language classroom: Introduction. Language Teaching Research, 23(2), 147-157.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817752718
Master, P. (1994). The effect of systematic instruction on learning the English article system. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 229-252). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Master, P. (2002). Information structure and English article pedagogy. System, 30, 331-348.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
Sabir, M. (2018). Specificity and article use: a theoretically informed classroom intervention. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 2(2), 137-163.
Slabakova, R. (2008). Meaning in the Second Language. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Slabakova, R. (2009a). Features or parameters: which one makes second language acquisition easier, and more interesting to study? Second Language Research, 25(2), 313-324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100291
Slabakova, R. (2009b). What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language? In M. Bowles, T. Ionin, S. Montrul, & A. Tremblay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2009) (pp. 280-294). Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Slabakova, R. (2013). What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language: A generative perspective. In M. d. P. García Mayo, M. J. Gutierrez Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), AILA Applied Linguistics Series (Vol. 9, pp. 5-28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Slabakova, R. (2016). Second Language Acquisition (First edition ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slabakova, R. (2019). The Bottleneck Hypothesis updated. In T. Ionin & M. Rispoli (Eds.), Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research (pp. 319–345). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Snape, N., & Yusa, N. (2013). Explicit article instruction in definiteness, specificity, genericity and perception. In M. Whong, K.-H. Gil, & H. Mardsen (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom (pp. 161-183). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sonbul, S., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge: Acquisition of collocations under different input conditions. Language Learning, 60, 263-308.
Spada, N., Shiu, J. L.-J., & Tomita, Y. (2015). Validating an elicited imitation task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Comparisons with other validation studies. Language Learning, 65(3), 723-751. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12129
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263-308.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x
U. C. L. E. Syndicate. (2001). Oxford Quick Placement Test: Paper and Pen Pack. In. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Umeda, M., Snape, N., Yusa, N., & Wilstshier, J. (2017). The long-term effect of explicit instruction on learners’ knowledge on English articles. Language Teaching Research, 00(0), 1-21.
Whong, M., Gil, K.-H., & Marsden, H. (2013). Introduction: Generative Second Language Acquisition and Language Pedagogy. In M. Whong, K.-H. Gil, & H. Marsden (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom (pp. 1-13). Dordrecht: Springer.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Española de Lingüística
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
