Atomicity & Countability in Linguistically-Informed Instruction
Atomicidad y contabilidad en la enseñanza lingüísticamente informada: adquisición de los tipos de nombres en inglés como L2 -- doi: https://doi.org/10.31810/rsel.53.2.3
Palabras clave:
Atomicidad; contabilidad; adquisición generativa de segundas lenguas; adquisición de segundas lenguas en contextos de instrucción; instrucción lingüísticamente informada; pedagogía lingüísticaResumen
Si bien la bibliografía muestra evidencias de los efectos de la instrucción explícita en el conocimiento explícito de la lengua, ha habido poca investigación sobre los efectos de los diferentes tipos de instrucción explícita sobre la adquisición de segundas lenguas. Este estudio pretende acercar dos enfoques (la adquisición de segundas lenguas en contextos de instrucción y la adquisición de segundas lenguas desde una perspectiva generativista) mediante la creación de un contexto de instrucción que emplea la teoría generativista para la enseñanza del uso de los artículos con los diferentes tipos de nombres en inglés L2. El estudio analiza tres contextos diferentes (instrucción lingüísticamente informada, instrucción tradicional y no instrucción) en la adquisición de sustantivos contables y no contables precedidos del artículo indefinido singular en inglés L2 por parte de hablantes de chino mandarín. Mediante una tarea de imitación de oraciones y una tarea de juicios de aceptabilidad desarrolladas en tres momentos (antes de la intervención pedagógica, inmediatamente después y al cabo de tres semanas), los resultados muestran que los estudiantes que recibieron instrucción explícita sobre las características semánticas que necesitan ser reestructuradas en la adquisición de los tipos de sustantivos mejoran de manera más significativa. Estos hallazgos sugieren que la instrucción lingüísticamente informada implementada de manera sistemática a lo largo de todo un curso de gramática podría conducir a un mayor aprendizaje en un período de tiempo más corto.
Descargas
Citas
Akakura, M. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of explicit instruction on implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 9-37.
Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition, 97(1), 41-66. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027704001787?via%3Dihub
Bowles, M. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contibute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 247-271.
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2013). What research can tell us about teaching: The case of pronouns and clitics. In M. Whong, K.-H. Gil, & H. Marsden (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom (pp. 17-34). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bunting, J. D., Diniz, L., & Reppen, R. (2009). Grammar and beyond 4. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R. (1998). Yi-wang tang, yi-ge tang: classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 28(3), 385-412.
Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 509-542. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192
Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R. (2014). The syntactic structure of noun phrases. In C. T. J. Huang, Y. H. A. Li, & A. Simpson (Eds.), The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics (pp. 248-274). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cho, J. (2012). Remapping nominal features in the second language. (PhD Dissertation). University of Iowa,
Cho, J., & Slabakova, R. (2014). Interpreting definiteness in a second language without articles: The case of L2 Russian. Second Language Research, 30(2), 159-190.
Choi, S. H., & Ionin, T. (2017). Acquisition and processing of mass nouns in L2-English by L2 learners from generalized classifier langauges: Evidence for the role of atomicity. In M. LeMendola & J. Scott (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Boston University Conference on Langauge Development (BUCLD 2016) (Vol. 1, pp. 154-167). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
Choi, S. H., Ionin, T., & Zhu, Y. (2018). L1 Korean and L1 Mandarin L2 English learners’ acquisition of the count/mass distinction in English. Second Language Research, 34(2), 147-177.
Choi, S. H., Zhu, Y., & Ionin, T. (2019). Interpretation of count and mass NPs by L2 learners from generalized classifier L1s. In T. Ionin & M. Rispoli (Eds.), Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research: Selected Papers from the 7th Meeting of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (pp. 253-270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed CLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Ellis, R. (2005b). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second langauge: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141-172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096
Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philip, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3-25). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol, UK ; Buffalo [N.Y.]: Multilingual Matters.
Gillon, B. (1992). Towards a common semantics for english count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15(6), 597-639. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628112
Hua, D., & Lee, T. H.-t. (2005). Chinese ESL learners’ understanding of the English count-mass distinction. In L. Dekydtspotter, R. A. Sprouse, & A. Liljestrand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004) (pp. 138-149). Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Inagaki, S. (2013). Syntax-semantics mappings as a source of difficulty in Japanese speakers’ acquisition of the mass-count distinction in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(3), 464-477.
Lardiere, D. (2008). Feature-assembly in seond language acquisition. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 106-140). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lardiere, D. (2009a). Further thoughts on parameteres and features in second language acquisition: A reply to peer comments on Lardiere’s ‘Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition’ in SLR 25(2). Second Language Research, 25(3), 409-422.
Lardiere, D. (2009b). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173-227.
Loewen, S. (2015). Introduction to Instructed Second Langauge Acquisition (1 ed.). New York: Routledge.
Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of resaerch. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359-382.
Long, M. H. (2009). Language teaching. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 3-5). Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Lopez, E. (2017). Teaching the English article system: Definiteness and specificity in linguistically-informed instruction. Language Teaching Research, 23(2), 200-217.
Lopez, E., & Sabir, M. (2017). Article pedagogy: Encouraging links between linguistic theory and teaching practice. RELC Journal, 50(1), 188-201.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217730143
Marsden, H., & Slabakova, R. (2019). Grammatical meaning and the second language classroom: Introduction. Language Teaching Research, 23(2), 147-157.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817752718
Master, P. (1994). The effect of systematic instruction on learning the English article system. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 229-252). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Master, P. (2002). Information structure and English article pedagogy. System, 30, 331-348.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
Sabir, M. (2018). Specificity and article use: a theoretically informed classroom intervention. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 2(2), 137-163.
Slabakova, R. (2008). Meaning in the Second Language. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Slabakova, R. (2009a). Features or parameters: which one makes second language acquisition easier, and more interesting to study? Second Language Research, 25(2), 313-324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100291
Slabakova, R. (2009b). What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language? In M. Bowles, T. Ionin, S. Montrul, & A. Tremblay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2009) (pp. 280-294). Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Slabakova, R. (2013). What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language: A generative perspective. In M. d. P. García Mayo, M. J. Gutierrez Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), AILA Applied Linguistics Series (Vol. 9, pp. 5-28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Slabakova, R. (2016). Second Language Acquisition (First edition ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slabakova, R. (2019). The Bottleneck Hypothesis updated. In T. Ionin & M. Rispoli (Eds.), Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research (pp. 319–345). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Snape, N., & Yusa, N. (2013). Explicit article instruction in definiteness, specificity, genericity and perception. In M. Whong, K.-H. Gil, & H. Mardsen (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom (pp. 161-183). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sonbul, S., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge: Acquisition of collocations under different input conditions. Language Learning, 60, 263-308.
Spada, N., Shiu, J. L.-J., & Tomita, Y. (2015). Validating an elicited imitation task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Comparisons with other validation studies. Language Learning, 65(3), 723-751. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12129
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263-308.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x
U. C. L. E. Syndicate. (2001). Oxford Quick Placement Test: Paper and Pen Pack. In. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Umeda, M., Snape, N., Yusa, N., & Wilstshier, J. (2017). The long-term effect of explicit instruction on learners’ knowledge on English articles. Language Teaching Research, 00(0), 1-21.
Whong, M., Gil, K.-H., & Marsden, H. (2013). Introduction: Generative Second Language Acquisition and Language Pedagogy. In M. Whong, K.-H. Gil, & H. Marsden (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom (pp. 1-13). Dordrecht: Springer.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista Española de Lingüística
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
