Considerations towards morphological assessment of English language learners

doi: https://doi.org/10.31810/rsel.53.2.4

Authors

Keywords:

Derivational morphology; English as a second language; Spanish as a first language, error analysis

Abstract

This paper attempts to give a more complete picture of the morphological acquisition of English as a second language by analyzing the responses obtained from a derivational test, both statistically and with error analysis. The test was administered to 130 university students divided into three proficiency groups and the analyses focused on words created with the suffixes -able and -er. Instead of scoring the answers as «correct/incorrect», they were analyzed on a continuum from «derived» to «invented». The overall aim of the paper is to identify the way in which morphological knowledge is developed considering the suffixes evaluated, the types of errors and language proficiency. The statistical analysis shows significant differences both in the acquisition of suffixes and between proficiency groups. The error analysis suggests that there are differences in the types of errors made considering students’ proficiency levels; e.g., the lowest proficiency group is more likely to add inflectional suffixes instead of derivational suffixes. The relevance of the work is to demonstrate that partial knowledge exists, making us reflect on evaluation issues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adamczyk, M. (2019). El análisis de errores en la enseñanza polaca del inglés frente a los estudios de errores de español lengua extranjera. Vistula University Working Papers, 64(1), 28-39.

Al-Homoud, F. (2017). EFL learners’ receptive and productive knowledge of word derivatives. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 5(2), 43-56.

Ali, M., Hamid, A., y Rahman, G. (2021). Acquisition of English derivational morphemes students of selected universities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 5(1), 338-355.

doi: https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/5.1.22

Archibald, J., y Libben, G. (2018). Morphological theory and second language acquisition. En J. Audring y F. Massini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory (pp. 522-540). Oxford University Press.

Bauer, L. (1983). English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bauer, L. y Nation, P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6(4), 253-279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/6.4.253

Bauer, L., Lieber, R. y Plag, I. (2013). The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bilynsky, M. (2015). The productivity of deverbal categories and suffixal models within shared-root deverbal paradigms as reflected in the Oxford English Dictionary. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 12(2), 32-45.

Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12(3), 169-190.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008131926604

Curinga, R. (2013). Direct and indirect effects of morphological awareness on reading comprehension for adolescent Spanish-English emergent bilinguals. BUCLD 37 Online Proceedings Supplement, 1-12.

https://www.bu.edu/bucld/files/2013/06/Curinga.pdf

Da Costa Moreira, B. (2014). Two types of dispositional adjectives. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem, número especial 8, 186-196.

http://www.revel.inf.br/files/7a70ca1e233064a8e187be5ff025c037.pdf

Danilović, J., Savić, J. D., y Dimitrijević, M. (2013). Affix Acquisition Order in Serbian EFL Learners. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 77-88.

doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/rjes-2013-0006

Donoso, E., y Gómez, R. (2018). Errores en discurso escrito en inglés por futuros profesores de inglés como lengua extranjera. Literatura y Lingüística, 38, 175-193. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29344/0717621x.38.1632

Hayashi, Y., y Murphy, V. (2011). An investigation of morphological awareness in Japanese learners of English. Language Learning Journal, 39(1), 105-120.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571731003663614

Hoyle, V. (2018). Informe final de investigación: Errores morfológicos, sintácticos y ortotipográficos en la traducción del español al inglés en los alumnos de los cursos «Inversa 1» e «Inversa 2» de la Facultad de Humanidades y Lenguas Modernas. Universidad Ricardo Palma. https://repositorio.urp.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.14138/2235/Informe_final_investigacion_2018_VHoyle.docx?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Karlsson, M. (2015). Advanced students’ L1 (Swedish) and L2 (English) mastery of suffixation. International Journal of English Studies, 15(1), 23-49.

doi: https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2015/1/196731

Kieffer, M. J. y Lesaux, N. K. (2008). The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing, 21(8), 783-804. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9092-8

Kieffer, M. J. y Lesaux, N. K. (2012). Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in the English reading comprehension of native English, Spanish, Filipino, and Vietnamese speakers. Language Learning, 62(4), 1170-1204.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00722.x

Kraut, R. (2015). The relationship between morphological awareness and morphological decomposition among English language learners. Reading and Writing, 28(6), 873-890. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9553-4

Lardiere, D. (2006). Knowledge of derivational morphology in a second language idiolect. En M. Grantham, C. Shea y J. Archibald (Eds.) Proceedings of the 8th generative approaches to second language acquisition conference (GASLA 2006), 72-79. Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Leontjev, D., Huhta, A., y Mäntylä, K. (2016). Word derivational knowledge and writing proficiency: How do they link?. System, 59, 73-89.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.03.013

Marín Serrano, F. (2013). Análisis y diagnóstico de errores en estudiantes de inglés como lengua extranjera. Exedra: Revista Científica, (8), 182-198.

Medellín Gómez, A. y Auza Benavides, A. (2008). Influencia del tamaño del vocabulario en el conocimiento morfológico de afijos, Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada, 47, 97-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/enallt.01852647p.2008.47.570

Mochizuki, M., y Aizawa, K. (2000). An affix acquisition order for EFL learners: An exploratory study. System, 28(2), 291-304.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00013-0

Muse, A. E. (2005). The nature of morphological knowledge. (Tesis de doctorado). Florida State University, Florida.

https://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A180396

Ramírez, G., Chen, X., Geva, E. y Kieffer, H. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. Reading and Writing, 23(3-4), 337-358.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9

Ramírez, G., Chen, X., Geva, E. y Luo, Y. (2011). Morphological awareness and word reading in English language learners: Evidence from Spanish and Chinese-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(3), 601-618. doi:

doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000233

Sánchez‐Gutiérrez, C. H., y Hernández Muñoz, N. (2018). Development of derivational morphological awareness in Anglophone learners of Spanish: A relational knowledge study. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 369-388.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12344

Sasao, Y., y Webb, S. (2017). The word part levels test. Language Teaching Research, 21(1), 12-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815586083

Schmitt, N., y Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework: Word associations and verbal suffixes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 17-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001022

Schmitt, N. y Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do learners know?. Tesol Quarterly, 36(2), 145-171. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588328

Stanfa, K. (2010). Differentiating among students: The value added of a dynamic assessment of morphological problem-solving (Tesis de doctorado). University of Pittsburgh, Pensilvania. https://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/10259/

Tyler, A. y Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(6), 649-667.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90002-8

Varatharajoo, C., Asmawi, A. B., Abdallah, N. y Abedalaziz, M. (2015). The awareness of morphemic knowledge for young adults’ vocabulary learning. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(2), 45-56. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085913

Vargas-Vega, B. (2018). Morfología derivativa nominal en el proceso de adquisición del inglés como L2 (Tesis de doctorado). Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro.

Vargas-Vega, B. y Velásquez Upegui, E. P. (2019). Adquisición de sustantivos deverbales del inglés como L2. Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica, (33), 189-206.

doi: https://doi.org/10.19053/0121053X.n33.2019.7992

Vargas-Vega, B. y Márquez Valencia, A.S. (2022). Producción de sufijos heterocategoriales por estudiantes mexicanos de inglés como segunda lengua. Semas, 3(5), 97-119.

Ward, J., y Chuenjundaeng, J. (2009). Suffix knowledge: Acquisition and applications. System, 37(3), 461-469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.004

Published

2023-11-23

How to Cite

Vargas-Vega, B., & Paquet, P.-L. . (2023). Considerations towards morphological assessment of English language learners: doi: https://doi.org/10.31810/rsel.53.2.4. Revista Española De Lingüística, 53(2), 119-140. Retrieved from http://revista.sel.edu.es/index.php/revista/article/view/2099

Issue

Section

Articles