Respuestas a preguntas  múltiples en el drama griego: doi: https://doi.org/10.31810/rsel.52.2.7

María López Romero; Sandra Rodríguez-Piedrabuena

Authors

María López Romero Universidad de Sevilla https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0081-2730
Sandra Rodríguez-Piedrabuena Universidad Autónoma de Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4675-6471

Keywords:

Multiple true questions; order of answers; preference for contiguity; Ancient Greek; Conversation Analysis

Abstract

The focus of this paper is to analyse the order in which heaped questions are answered in a selection of plays by Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, Aristophanes, and Menander. According to Sacks (1987), the last question is expected to be answered first by virtue of the so-called «preference for contiguity». This is the usual order in Homer, as Cicero already noticed (Att. 1. 16. 1). In Greek Drama, however, we can hardly affirm that there is any preference for contiguity, at least as far as multiple questions and multiple answers are concerned.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andò, V. (2021). Euripide. Ifigenia in Aulide. Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. Venecia: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.

doi: https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-513-1

Bassett, S. E. (1920). ῞ΥΣΤΕΡΟΝ ΠΡΟΤΕΡΟΝ ὉΜΗΡΙΚΩΣ (Cicero, Att. 1, 16, 1). Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 31, 39-62.

CGCG = Emde Boas, E. van, Rijksbaron, A., Huitink, L. y de Bakker, M. (2019). The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139027052

Condello, F. (2016). Sofocle. Edipo Re. Milán: Rusconi Libri.

Dawe, R. D. (1996). Sophoclis Oedipus Rex (3ª ed.). Leipzig: Teubner.

Dawe, R. D. (2006). Sophocles. Oedipus Rex (2ª ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Denniston, J. D. (1954). The Greek Particles (2ª ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Díaz Tejera, A. (1973). La frase interrogativa como modalidad. Revista Española de Lingüística, 3(1), 95-116.

Recuperado de: http://revista.sel.edu.es/index.php/revista/article/view/284

Diggle, J. (1984-1994). Euripidis fabulae (3 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198145943.book.1 (vol. 1);

doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198145905.book.1 (vol. 2);

doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198145950.book.1 (vol. 3)

Diggle, J. (1990). The Teubner Phoenissae. The Classical Review, 40(1), 6-11.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X0025186X

Enfield, N. J., Stivers, T., Brown, P., Englert, C., Harjunpää, K., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Keisanen, T., Rauniomaa, M., Raymond, C. W., Rossano, F., Yoon, K.-E., Zwitserlood, I. y Levinson, S. C. (2019). Polar answers. Journal of Linguistics, 55(2), 277-304.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226718000336

Finglass, P. J. (2018). Sophocles. Oedipus the King. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108303439

Hayano, K. (2013). Question Design in Conversation. En J. Sidnell y T. Stivers (Eds.). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 395-414). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch19

Heritage, J. y Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions. En J. P. De Ruiter (Ed.). Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives (pp. 179-192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045414.013

Jong, I. J. F. de (1991). Narrative in Drama. The Art of the Euripidean Messenger-Speech. Leiden: Brill.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004329126

Kamerbeek, J. C. (1967). The Plays of Sophocles. Commentaries. Part IV: The Oedipus Tyrannus. Leiden: Brill.

Kovacs, D. (2002). Euripides. Helen. Phoenician Women. Orestes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Lee, S.-H. (2013). Response Design in Conversation. En J. Sidnell y T. Stivers (Eds.). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 415-432). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch20

Liddicoat, A. J. (2022). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis (3ª ed.). Londres: Bloomsbury.

Lloyd-Jones, H. y Wilson, N. G. (1990). Sophoclis fabulae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198145776.book.1

March, J. (2020). Sophocles. Oedipus Tyrannus. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

Mastronarde, D. J. (1979). Contact and Discontinuity: Some Conventions of Speech and Action on the Greek Tragic Stage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Mastronarde, D. J. (1988). Euripides. Phoenissae. Leipzig: Teubner.

Minchin, E. (2001). How Homeric is «Hysteron Proteron?». Mnemosyne, 54(6), 635-645. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685250152952112

Minchin, E. (2007). Homeric Voices. Discourse, Memory, Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280124.001.0001

Mittwoch, A. (1979). Final Parentheticals with English Questions: Their Illocutionary Function and Grammar. Journal of Pragmatics, 3(5), 401-412.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(79)90016-X

Murray, G. (1902). Euripidis fabulae (vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Page, D. L. (1972). Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoedias. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198145707.book.1

Pearson, A. C. (1929). Sophoclea III. The Classical Quarterly, 23(3/4), 164-176.

Perusino, F. (Ed.). y Beta, S. (Trad.). (2020). Aristofane. Lisistrata. Milán: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla/Mondadori.

Pomerantz, A. y Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. En J. Sidnell y T. Stivers (Eds.). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 210-228). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch11

Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939-967.

doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752

Risselada R. (1993). Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Ámsterdam: J.C. Gieben.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004408975

Risselada, R. y Shalev, D. (en prensa). Sequencing, Adjacency and Preference. En R. Verano (Ed.). Conversation Analysis and Classics. Talk in Ιnteraction in Greek and Latin Literature.

Rodríguez-Piedrabuena, S. (2021). Preguntas indirectas ecoicas en griego clásico. Euphrosyne, 49, 77-99.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.EUPHR.5.128796

Rodríguez-Piedrabuena, S. (en prensa). Repetitional Responses in Classical Greek. En R. Verano (Ed.). Conversation Analysis and Classics. Talk in Interaction in Greek and Latin Literature.

Rodríguez-Piedrabuena, S. y Verano, R. (en prensa). Actions and Turns. En R. Verano (Ed.). Conversation Analysis and Classics. Talk in Interaction in Greek and Latin Literature.

Ruiz Yamuza, E. (2011). Aproximación a las estrategias de mitigación en Plutarco: el uso de adverbios de modalidad. En J. M. Candau Morón, F. J. González Ponce y A. L. Chávez Reino (Eds.). Plutarco transmisor. Actas del X Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Plutarquistas (pp. 505-519). Sevilla: Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla.

Sacks, H. ([1987] 2010). On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation. En P. Griffiths, A. J. Merrison y A. Bloomer (Eds.). Language in Use. A Reader (pp. 8-22). Abingdon: Routledge.

Sadock, J. M. (1970). Whimperatives. En J. M. Sadock y A. L. Vanek (Eds.). Studies Presented to Robert B. Lees by his Students. Linguistic Research (pp. 223-239). Edmonton: Linguistic Research.

Sadock, J. M. (1971). Queclaratives. En C. Corum et al. (Eds.). Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (pp. 223-232). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Sandbach, F. H. (1972). Menandri reliquiae selectae. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198147374.book.1

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis (vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208

Schegloff, E. A. y Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up Closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289-327.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289

Schenkeveld, D. M. (1984). Studies in the History of Ancient Linguistics: II. Stoic and Peripatetic Kinds of Speech Act and the Distinction of Grammatical Moods. Mnemosyne, 37(3/4), 291-353.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852590X00054

Schmidt-Radefeldt, J. (1977). On So-Called ‘Rhetorical’ Questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 1(4), 375-392.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(77)90029-7

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438

Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Siemund, P. (2018). Speech Acts and Clause Types: English in a Cross-Linguistic Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stivers, T. (2013). Sequence Organization. En J. Sidnell y T. Stivers (Eds.). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 191-209). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch10

Stivers, T. y Hayashi, M. (2010). Transformative Answers: One Way to Resist a Question’s Constraints. Language in Society, 39, 1-25.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509990637

Suñer, M. (1999). La subordinación sustantiva: La interrogación indirecta. En. I. Bosque y V. Demonte (Eds.). Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (vol. 2, pp. 2149-2195). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

Veloudis, I. (2018). Exploiting Polar Questions for Expressive Purposes: ‘Queclaratives’ and ‘Whimperatives’ in Modern Greek. Lingua, 204, 117-133.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.12.008

Verano, R. (2022). Politeness and Interaction in Ancient Greek: Preventing and Avoiding Dispreferred Reactions in the Dialogues of Plato. Veleia, 39, 209-223.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1387/veleia.22513

West, M. L. (1987). Euripides. Orestes. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.

Wilson, N. G. (2007). Aristophanis fabulae (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198721802.book.1 (vol. 1);

doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198721819.book.1 (vol. 2)