Los eventos de desplazamiento: una perspectiva léxico-sintáctica
Resumen
Resumen
Este artículo ofrece una propuesta léxico-sintáctica, basada en Mateu 2002, para el estudio de los eventos de desplazamiento. El análisis se centrará en las formas sistemáticas en que las lenguas organizan los componentes semánticos tales como desplazamiento, trayectoria y manera, etc. Se propone incorporar los patrones de lexicalización de Talmy 1991, 2000 a esta propuesta léxico-sintáctica, de modo que se obtengan más ventajas tanto teóricas como empíricas en el momento de clasificar las lenguas de marco verbal y las lenguas de marco satélite, de una forma transparente sintácticamente. Se aplica la propuesta establecida a los eventos de desplazamiento del chino y con estos criterios se mantiene la clasificación de Talmy del chino entre las lenguas de marco satélite. Finalmente, se propone que diferentes factores contribuyen a la diferencia inter/intra-lingüística y que estos factores pueden pertenecer a diferentes dimensiones o diferentes niveles. La clasificación de las lenguas de marco verbal y las de marco satélite afecta a un factor universal, aunque también, para entender los comportamientos de los eventos de desplazamiento, hay que tener en cuenta las propiedades específicas de cada lengua.
Palabras clave: estructura argumental; eventos de desplazamiento; incorporación; marco satélite; marco verbal, patrones de lexicalización; fusión; variación interlingüística.
Abstract
This paper offers a lexical-syntactic approach, based on Mateu 2002, to account for the argument structure of motion events. We focus on the systematic difference of languages with regard to the organization of semantic components like motion, path, manner and so on. We incorporate the lexicalization patterns of Talmy 1991, 2000 to our lexicalsyntactic approach and this proposal allows us to classify languages into verb-framed or satellite-framed in a more transparent manner. This approach is applied to motion events in Chinese and, with the established criteria, the classification of Chinese by Talmy as a satellite-framed language can be maintained. Lastly, we propose that different factors contribute to the inter/intra-linguistic differences and that these factors may belong to different dimensions or different levels. The classification of a language as satellite-framed or verb-framed is universal. Moreover, in order to have a full picture of motion events occurring in different languages, consideration of specific factors of each language is required.
Keywords: argument structure; conflation and incorporation; lexicalization patterns; motion events; satellite-framed languages; verbal-framed languages.
Descargas
Citas
Acedo Matellán, V. (2010): Argument structure and the syntax-morphology interface. A case study in Latin and other languages, Tesis Doctoral, Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona.
Aske, J. (1989): «Path predicates in English and Spanish: a closer look», en Hall, K., Michael, M. y Richard, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the Berkeley linguistic society 15, Berkeley, CA, Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 1-14.
Baker, M. (1988): Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function change, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Baños Baños, J. M. (2014): «Dos tipos de intransitividad en latín: sintaxis y semántica», en Villa, J. de la y otros (eds.), Ianua classicorum. Temas y formas del Mundo Clásico (Actas
de XIII Congreso español de estudios clásicos), vol. I, Madrid, pp. 759-790.
Borer, H. (2003): «Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon», en Moore, J. C. y Polinsky, M. (eds.), The nature of explanation in linguistic theory, Stanford, California, CSLI Publications, pp. 31-67.
—, (2005): Structuring sense: The normal course of events, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1995): The minimalist program, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Collins, C. (1997): «Argument sharing in serial verb constructions», Linguistic Inquiry 28, 3, pp. 461-497.
Fábregas, A. (2007): «An exhaustive lexicalisation account of directional complements», en Bašić, M., Pantcheva, M., Son, M. y Svenonius, P. (eds.), Tromsø Working Papers on Language & Linguistics: Nordlyd 34 2, Special issue on space, motion, and result, Tromsø, CASTL, pp. 165-199.
Fan, S. (2014): Argument structure in Mandarin Chinese: a lexical-syntactic perspective, Tesis doctoral, Madrid, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Hale, K. y Keyser, S. J. (1991): «On the syntax of argument structure», The Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.
Hale, K. y Keyser, S. J. (1992): «The syntactic character of thematic structure», en Roca, I. M. (ed.), Thematic structure: Its role in grammar, Dordrecht, Foris, pp. 107-144.
—, (1993): «On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations», en Hale, K. y Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, pp. 53-109.
—, (1997a): «On the complex nature of simple predicators», en Alsina i Keith, À., Bresnan, J. y Sells P. (eds.), Complex predicates, Stanford, CA, CSLI Publications
—, (1997b): «The limits of argument structure», en Mendikoetxea, A. y Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (eds.), Theoretical issues at morphology-syntax interface, University of Basque Country, pp. 203-230.
—, (1998): «The basic elements of argument structure», en Harley, H. (ed.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32, Papers from the Upenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and aspect, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, pp. 73-118.
—, (2002): Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
—, (2005): «Aspect and the syntax of argument structure», en Erteschik-Shir, N. y Rapoport, T. (eds.), The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation, Oxford, Oxford
University Press, pp. 11-41.
Halle, M. y Marantz, A. (1993): «Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection», en Hale, K. y Keyser, S. J. (eds.). The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, pp. 111-176.
—, (1994): «Some key features of distributed morphology», en Carnie, A. y Harley, H. (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21. Papers in phonology and morphology, Cambridge, MA, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 275-288.
Harley, H. y Noyer, R. (1999): «Distributed morphology», Glot International 4, pp. 3-9.
Haugen, J. D. (2009): «Hyponymous objects and late insertion», Lingua 119, pp. 242-262.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2005): «Leonard Talmy. A windowing to conceptual structure and language», Annual review of cognitive linguistics 3, John Benjamins AmsterdamFiladelfia, pp. 325-347.
Jackendoff, R. (1987): « The Status of thematic relations in linguistic theory», Linguistic Inquiry 18. 3, pp. 369-411
—, (1990): Semantic structure, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Kratzer, A. (1996): «Severing the external argument from the verb», en Rooryck, J. y Zaring, L. (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Puslishers, pp. 109-137.
Lamarre, C. (2005): «The linguistic encoding of motion events in Chinese – with reference to cross-dialectal variation –», Ms, University of Tokyo.
—, (2008): «The linguistic categorization of deictic direction in Chinese – with reference to Japanese –», en Xu, D. (ed.), Space in languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives, Dordrecht, Springer Science-Business Media B. V., pp. 69-97.
Levin, B. y Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995): Unaccusativity. At the syntax-lexical semantics interface, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
—, (2008): «Lexicalized manner and result are in complementary distribution», presentado en IATL 24, Jerusalem, October 26-27.
Marantz, A. (2001): «Words», Ms, Cambridge, MA, MIT.
Mateu, J. (2001): «Preverbs in complex denominal verbs: Lexical adjuncts or core predicates?», Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 9, pp. 37-51.
—, (2002): Argument structure: Relational construal at the syntax-semantics interface, Tesis doctoral, Bellaterra, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
—, (2012): «Conflation and incorporation processes in resultative constructions», en Demonte, V. y McNally L. (eds.), Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 252-278.
Mendikoetxea, A. (2007): «En busca de los primitivos léxicos y su realización sintáctica: del léxico a la sintaxis y viceversa», en Cabré Monné, T. (ed.), Lingüística teòrica: anàlisi i perspectives II, Catalan journal of linguistics, pp. 55-102.
Peyraube, A. (2006): «Motion events in Chinese: A diachronic study of directional complements», en Hickmann, M. y Robert, S. (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, Ámsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 121-135.
Rappaport Hovav, M. y Levin B. (1998): «Building verb meanings», en Butt, M. y Geuder, W. (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factores, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 97-134.
Real Puigdollers, C. (2010): «A microparametric approaches on goal of motion constructions: Properties of adpositional systems in Romance and Germanic», Catalan Jurnal of Linguistics 9, pp. 125-150.
Ritter, E. y Rosen, S. T. 1998: «Delimiting events in Syntax», en Butt, M. y Geuder, W. (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and syntactic constraints, Stanford, CSLI Publications, pp. 135-164.
Shi, Y. (2002): The establishment of modern Chinese grammar: the formation of the resultative construction and its effects, Ámsterdam, John Benjamins.
Slobin, D. I. (2004): «The many ways to search for a fog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events», en Strömqvist, S. y Verhoeven, L. (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Vol. 2. Typological and contextual perspectives, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 219-257.
Slobin, D. I. y Hoiting, N. (1994): «Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations», en Gahl, S., Dolbey, A. y Johnkinker, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the Berkeley linguistics society 20, Berkeley, CA, Berkeley Linguistics
Society, pp. 487-505.
Snyder, W. (1995): Language acquisition and language variation: The role of morphology, Tesis doctoral, MIT.
—, (2001): «On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation», Language 77, 2, pp. 324-342.
—, (2005a): «Motion predicates and the compounding parameter: A new approach», Trabajo presentado en Linguistics colloquium series, University of Maryland.
—, (2005b): «Motion predicates and the compounding parameter», Nanzan linguistics No.2, March 2005: Research results and activities 2004, Nagoya, Japón, Center for Linguistics, Nanzan University, pp. 103-105.
—, (2012): «Parameter theory and motion predicates», en Demonte, V. y McNally, L. (eds.), Telicity, change, and state: a cross-categorial view of event structure, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 279-299.
Son, M. (2007): «Directionality and resultativity: the cross-linguistic correlation revisited», en Bašić, M., Pantcheva, M., Son, M. y Svenonius, P. (eds.), Tromsø Working Papers on Language & Linguistics: Nordlyd 34 2, Special issue on space, motion, and result, Tromsø: CASTL, pp. 126-164.
—, (2009): «Linguistic variation and lexical parameter: The case of directed motion», U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 15, 1, pp. 213-222.
—, y Svenonius, P. (2008): «Microparameters of cross-linguistic variation: Directed motion and resultatives», en Abner, N. y Bishop, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West coast conference on formal linguistics, Somerville, MA, Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 388-396.
Spencer, A. y Zaretskaya, M. (1998): «Verb prefixation in Russian as lexical subordination», Linguistics 36, pp. 1-39.
Stiebels, B. (1998): «Complex denominal verbs in German and the morphology-semantics interface», en Booij, G. y van Marle, J. (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1997, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 265-302.
Tai, J. H.-Y. (2003): «Cognitive relativism: Resultative construction in Chinese», Language and Linguistics 4, 2, pp. 301-316.
Talmy, L. (1975): «Semantics and syntax of motion», en Kimball, J. P. (ed.), Syntax and semantics 4, Nueva York, Academic Press, pp. 181-238.
—, (1985): «Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms», en Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-149.
–, (1991): «Path to realization: A typology of event conflation», Proceedings of the Berkeley linguistics society 17, pp. 480-519.
—, (2000): Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 2: Typology and process in concept structuring, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Travis, L. (1984): Parameters and effects of word order variation, Tesis doctoral, Cambridge, MA, MIT.
Xu, D. (2008): «Asymmetry in the expression of space in Chinese – the Chinese language meets typology», en Xu, D. (ed.), Space in languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives, Dordrecht, Springer Science + Business Media B. V., pp. 175-198.
